Year 8, Number 31, January 2006

 

Oncología II
Article N°AJ31-19

 

 


Andrade Leal de Abreu, Benedita ; Melo, Nayana; Ayrton Santos, Luis; Leal de Abreu, Evandro; Gomes, José Carlos; Nunes, Elisa Rosa; Pereira Filho, Edgar and Batista de Abreu, João

Centro Bionuclear de Diagnóstico;
Universidade Estadual do Piauí;
Universidade Federaldo Piauí;
Hospital São Marcos; Teresina-Piauí, Brasil.

Cita/Reference:
Andrade Leal de Abreu, Benedita ; Melo, Nayana; Ayrton Santos, Luis. et al. Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer – Preliminary Experience. Alasbimn Journal 8(31): January 2006.



Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer – Preliminary Experience


Objective: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or selective lymphadenectomyis increasingly becoming an alternative method for assessing axillary status inbreast carcinoma patients (Vijayakumar et al., 2005). This technique has beenproposed as an alternative to complete axillary dissection in patients havingsmall invasive tumors and clinically negative axilla, considering as the mainadvantage of this procedure a decrease in the associated morbidity of a largerlymphadenectomy (Glass et al., 1999; Veronesi et al., 1997). This technique isalready well established for cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer (Mariani etal., 2001). The objective of thepresent work is to report a series of consecutive cases of patients withmammary cancer who have undergone sentinel node biopsy after previouslymphoscintigraphy.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, 27patients have been evaluated. Those patients were submitted toradioguided surgery procedures between March and August 2005.All patients were submitted to sentinel lymph node identification and biopsy.We have considered the following parameters: age of the patient, complementarydata of the clinical presentation of the tumor, exams (mammography, mammaryultrasound), intervention performed by nuclear medicine, surgical data,histological analysis of biopsies and surgical pieces. The age of the patients ranged from 38 to 77 years-old (avrg 54,9). All patients were injected a 300-600µCi (microcuries) activity of the radiopharmaceutical Dextran-99mTc the daybefore surgery intradermal aroundperiareolar area or a deeper peritumoral injection. Scintigraphic images wereperformed by gama–camera for anterior and lateral projections to visualizeradiolabeled sentinel node and mark its correspondent site on suprajacent skin. During surgical act, sentinel lymph node was detected by a gamma probe, excisedby the surgeon and immediately sent to frozen section, at a first time, and forhistopathological examination under hematoxylin/eosin staining.

Results and discussion: In the present studysentinel node identification rate was 92,6% (25/27).Thirty six sentinel lymph nodes were removed, performingan average of 1,3 nodes per patient. In one patient (3,7%) sentinel node wasfound in the internal mammary chain and in 24 patients (88,89%) the location wasaxillary. The average size of the tumors was 28,9mm (range 14-45mm). In 7 cases (25,9%), sentinel lymph nodes were positive for malignancy inthe frozen study, and patients had their axillary lymphanedectomy completed; 17patients (63%) were reported as negative. All frozen results were confirmed atdefinitive histopathologic analysis with cuts of inclusion in paraffin. Radionuclidesentinel lymph node (SLN) localization and biopsy is a staging procedure thatis being used to evaluate patients with invasive breast cancer who haveclinically normal axillary nodes (Keshtgar et al., 1999). According to medical literature the sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast carcinomaallows sampling of the lymph node or nodes that directly drain an area ofcarcinoma of the breast. The major advantage of this technique is that if thesentinel lymph node is negative for metastases, a complete axillarylymphadenectomy can be avoided, with its increased morbidity. So,identification and biopsy of the sentinel lymph node(s) SL is a valid methodfor determining if total axillary dissection in initial breast cancer patientsshould or not be avoided.

CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph nodelocalization represent an important aid in surgical management of breast cancer, as it can be concluded,in accordance with medical literature.

 


2-Deoxy-2-Fluoro-D-glucosa marcada con F-18 (PET/RM) en la determinación de recidivas tumorales vs. perfusión por resonancia magnética en pacientes con tumoraciones del sistema nervioso central | Comparación de PET-TC versus TC para detectar enfermedad residual post-tratamiento en pacientes con linfoma. Nuestra experiencia | Utilidad del PET-FDG en tumores gastrointestinales | Implementación de un banco de datos integrado por información general e imágenes morfo-metabólicas con características de variantes normales | Niveles de Cyfra 21.1 en pacientes con Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario y Cáncer Pulmonar evaluados mediante PET-CT | CT/PET en Cancer de Mama: Experiencia en Venezuela | Clinical Experience in Oncologic Patients with the First CT/PET Scanner in Venezuela | Evaluación de ganglios regionales en pacientes con carcinoma de pene mediante dos técnicas nucleares: resultados preliminares | Tratamiento de 351 pacientes con cáncer de mama, ganglio centinela negativo, sin disección axilar posterior | Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer – Preliminary Experience | Patrones Linfoscintigráficos del Drenaje Linfático de la Pared Torácica Posterior a Mastectomía Radical Modificada Tipo Madden y Disección Axilar Homolateral en Pacientes con Cáncer De Mama | Cancer mamario (CM): investigación del ganglio centinela (GC). Estudio prospectivo sin linfadectomia axilar (LA) posterior | Estudio del ganglio centinela con sonda radioguiada, primeras experiencias en el Ecuador | Avaliação retrospectiva da Pesquisa do Linfonodo Sentinela (PLS) em 92 pacientes com neoplasia maligna mamária | Print

 

 

Sitio desarrollado por SISIB - Universidad de Chile